Rodriguez-Gonzalez v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff’s failure to allege “specific facts to show that any action taken by Defendant . . . was either an adverse action against Plaintiff or was connected to Plaintiff’s ADA advocacy” warranted dismissal of his claim
• “[D]eterrence is the primary purpose of Rule 11 sanctions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).