Paterson-Leitch Company, Inc. v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \an unsuccessful party is not entitled as of right to de novo review... of an argument never seasonably raised before the magistrate [judge]\
• holding that “an unsuccessful party is not entitled as of right to de novo review ... of an argument never seasonably raised before the magistrate”
• holding that “an unsuccessful party is not entitled as of right to de novo review . . . of an argument never seasonably raised before the magistrate”
• holding that “an unsuccessful party is not entitled as of right to de novo review . . . of an argument never seasonably raised before the magistrate”
• finding insufficient a Rule 56(f) affidavit which “merely conjecture[d] that something might be discovered but provide[d] no realistic basis for believing that further discovery would disclose evidence” of material facts
• “[T]his court will not consider ‘an argument which could have been, but inexplicably was not, presented’ to the Magistrate Judge in the first instance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).