Camardo v. General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that recitations of nearly identical arguments are insufficient as objections and constitute an improper “second bite at the apple’
• holding that recitations of nearly identical arguments are insufficient as objections and constitute an improper “second bite at the apple’
• holding recitations of nearly identical arguments are insufficient as objections and constitute an improper “second bite at the apple”
• holding recitations of nearly identical arguments are insufficient as objections and constitute an improper “second bite at the apple’
• holding recitations of nearly identical arguments are insufficient as objections and constitute an improper “second bite at the apple’
• explaining that court need not consider objections that merely constitute a \rehashing\ of the same arguments and positions taken in original papers submitted to the magistrate judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).