Elbert L. BOWLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that vocational expert testimony must be based on a hypothetical question that includes all limitations supported by the record
• stating that the court may not reweigh evidence, try the case de novo, or overturn the 10 Commissioner’s decision if the evidence preponderates against it
• stating that the court may not reweigh evidence, try the case de novo, or overturn the 3 4 Commissioner’s decision if the evidence preponderates against it
• stating the court may not reweigh evidence, try the case de 18 novo, or overturn the Commissioner’s decision if the evidence preponderates against it
• stating the court may not reweigh evidence, try the case de novo, or overturn the Commissioner’s 14 decision if the evidence preponderates against it
• stating the court may not reweigh evidence, try the case de novo, or overturn the Commissioner’s 14 decision if the evidence preponderates against it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).