Skip to main content
· 8/11/1987

Samuel C. EVANGELISTA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, Appellee

Citations

  • 826 F.2d 136
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10642
  • 18 Soc. Serv. Rev. 711

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an ALJ’s decision must be affirmed if supported by substantial evidence, “even if the record arguably could justify a different conclusion”
  • explaining that the ALJ is entitled “to piece together the relevant medical facts from the findings and opinions of multiple physicians.”
  • explaining that a judge may “piece together the relevant medical facts from the findings and opinions of multiple physicians”
  • explaining that a judge may “piece together the relevant medical facts from the findings and opinions of multiple physicians”
  • noting that the ALJ is entitled “to piece together the relevant medical facts from the findings and opinions of multiple physicians”
  • explaining that the ALJ is entitled “to piece together the relevant medical facts from the findings and opinions of multiple physicians.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Coffin, Selya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.