Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing 20 that as a lay person, the ALJ is “simply not qualified to interpret raw medical data 21 in functional terms”
• noting that “[a]s a 25 lay person . . . the ALJ was simply not qualified to interpret raw medical data in functional terms”
• “The ALJ’s findings . . . are not conclusive when derived by ignoring evidence, misapplying the law, or judging matters entrusted to experts.”
• as a lay person, the ALJ is “simply not qualified to interpret raw medical data in functional terms”
• “As a 20 lay person, ... the ALJ was simply not qualified to interpret raw medical data in functional terms 21 and no medical opinion supported the determination.”
• “The ALJ’s findings of fact are conclusive when supported by substantial evidence, but are not conclusive when derived by ignoring evidence, misapplying the law, or judging matters entrusted to experts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).