Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Fifth Circuit· 7/10/1987

Bobby Battle v. U.S. Parole Commission

Citations

  • 834 F.2d 419
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 17412
  • 1987 WL 3511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that parties filing objections must specifically identify those findings objected to, and a court need not consider frivolous, conclusive, or general objections
  • stating that if an objection lacks the requisite specificity, then de novo review is not required
  • explaining that if the party fails to properly object because the objections lack the requisite specificity, then de novo review by the court is not required.
  • explaining that if the party fails to properly object because the objections lack the requisite specificity, then de novo review by the court is not required
  • explaining that if the party fails to properly object because the objections lack the requisite specificity, then de novo review by the court is not required.
  • explaining that if the party fails to properly object because the objections lack the requisite specificity, then de novo review by the court is not required.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Williams, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.