Bobby Battle v. U.S. Parole Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that parties filing objections must specifically identify those findings objected to, and a court need not consider frivolous, conclusive, or general objections
• stating that if an objection lacks the requisite specificity, then de novo review is not required
• explaining that if the party fails to properly object because the objections lack the requisite specificity, then de novo review by the court is not required.
• explaining that if the party fails to properly object because the objections lack the requisite specificity, then de novo review by the court is not required
• explaining that if the party fails to properly object because the objections lack the requisite specificity, then de novo review by the court is not required.
• explaining that if the party fails to properly object because the objections lack the requisite specificity, then de novo review by the court is not required.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).