Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 11/6/1992

Rath v. Selection Research, Inc.

Citations

  • 978 F.2d 1087
  • 15 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2816
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28899
  • 1992 WL 317491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding causal connection not likely established when only evidence is notice of termination which occurred six months after reprimand for filing a complaint
  • stating standard, but expressing doubt that discharge six months after alleged whistle-blowing met causal connection requirement
  • stating that it was doubtful that plaintiff had established a prima facie case when only evidence of causal connection was that his termination came about six months after employer reprimanded him for questioning proposed changes in employee stock ownership plans
  • discharge soon after protected activity is indirect proof of causal connection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Rath v. Selection Research, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.