Lora Stuart v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that proof possibly sufficient to establish a prima facie case was insufficient to establish pretext
• holding that no rational jury could conclude that a nine-day delay to investigate a sexual-harassment complaint was not prompt
• recognizing that a claim is administratively exhausted if it is specifically stated in, grows out of, or is reasonably related to the substance of the allegations in an administrative charge or complaint
• recognizing that administrative exhaustion is required before filing a Title VII or MHRA claim
• recognizing that a claim is administratively exhausted if it is specifically stated in, grows out of, or is reasonably related to the substance of the allegations in an administrative charge or complaint
• finding that proof possibly sufficient to establish a prima facie case was insufficient to establish pretext

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).