Skip to main content
· 6/26/2000

Mary Buettner v. Arch Coal Sales Co., Inc. And Arch Coal, Inc.

Citations

  • 216 F.3d 707
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14565
  • 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 522
  • 2000 WL 815664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no adverse employment action where plaintiff offered no evidence that the confrontation with her supervisor resulted in a materially significant disadvantage
  • stating that a plaintiff “must adduce enough admissible evidence to raise genuine doubt as to the legitimacy of a defendant’s motive, even if that evidence does not directly contradict or disprove a defendant’s articulated reasons for its actions”
  • stating that a plaintiff “must adduce enough admissible evidence to raise genuine doubt as to the legitimacy of a defendant’s motive, even if that evidence does not directly contradict or disprove a defendant’s articulated reasons for its actions”
  • conducting analysis of a Title VII claim under the framework of the EPA where the alleged discrimination related solely to unequal pay for equal work
  • reporting supervisor’s comment that “women and minorities don’t belong in [this] business” was protected act of opposition
  • rejecting as \pure speculation\ plaintiff's claim, unsupported by any evidence, that supervisor wanted to get rid of her because her filing of discrimination complaint would jeopardize his advancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Carman, Hansen, International, Trade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.