· 6/26/2000
Mary Buettner v. Arch Coal Sales Co., Inc. And Arch Coal, Inc.
Citations
- 216 F.3d 707
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14565
- 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 522
- 2000 WL 815664
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no adverse employment action where plaintiff offered no evidence that the confrontation with her supervisor resulted in a materially significant disadvantage
- stating that a plaintiff “must adduce enough admissible evidence to raise genuine doubt as to the legitimacy of a defendant’s motive, even if that evidence does not directly contradict or disprove a defendant’s articulated reasons for its actions”
- stating that a plaintiff “must adduce enough admissible evidence to raise genuine doubt as to the legitimacy of a defendant’s motive, even if that evidence does not directly contradict or disprove a defendant’s articulated reasons for its actions”
- conducting analysis of a Title VII claim under the framework of the EPA where the alleged discrimination related solely to unequal pay for equal work
- reporting supervisor’s comment that “women and minorities don’t belong in [this] business” was protected act of opposition
- rejecting as \pure speculation\ plaintiff's claim, unsupported by any evidence, that supervisor wanted to get rid of her because her filing of discrimination complaint would jeopardize his advancement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman, Carman, Hansen, International, Trade
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.