Harold W. Mathews, Jr. v. Trilogy Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a time lapse of two months between the protected activity and the employee’s discharge may create an inference of a retaliatory motive
• affirming dismissal of discrimination claims because plaintiff failed to offer “sufficient evidence for a reasonable trier of fact to infer discrimination”
• time lapse of two months between protected activity and discharge may create inference of retaliatory motive in ERISA context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).