Skip to main content

Randolph v. State

Citations

  • 853 So. 2d 1051
  • 2003 WL 1922772

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that a defendant’s subjective fears are'not reasonably sufficient to justify a well-founded fear of prejudice
  • explaining that “merely making references to arguments below without further elucidation does not suffice to preserve issues, and these claims are deemed to have been waived.”
  • finding that an affidavit cannot be admitted into evidence in a postconviction proceeding unless it falls under one of the four hearsay exceptions by which the statement of a declarant who is unavailable as a witness may be presented into evidence
  • affirming exclusion of affidavit by a witness who died before post- conviction evidentiary hearing
  • affirming exclusion of affidavit by a witness who died before postconviction evidentiary hearing
  • affirming the postconviction court’s finding that none of the additional mitigation witnesses at -2- the evidentiary hearing offered any evidence other than what had already been presented by Dr. Krop at the penalty phase

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.