Supreme Court of Florida· 3/13/2008
Rose v. State
Citations
- 985 So. 2d 500
- 2008 WL 658243
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Rose has merely stated a conclusion and referred to arguments made below. Thus, we consider the issue waived for appellate review.”
- “Rose has merely stated a conclusion and referred to arguments made below. Thus, we consider the issue waived for appellate review.”
- trial court did not err in denying defendant's postconviction claim of ineffective assistance of 12 counsel based on counsel's failure to obtain a timely ruling from the trial court as the record established there was no prejudice to defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tompkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-11-07· cited 121×
- Daniel Lugo v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2014-04-24· cited 90×
- Troy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-01-06· cited 48×
- Ventura v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-29· cited 46×
- Sexton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-09-18· cited 28×
- Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-11-18· cited 26×
- Long v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-07-11· cited 25×
- Darling v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-07-01· cited 24×
- Duest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-02-19· cited 19×
- Fernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-09-02· cited 19×
- & SC13-2422 Gerhard Hojan v. State of Florida & Gerhard Hojan v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2017-01-31· cited 8×
- & SC13-2422 Gerhard Hojan v. State of Florida and Gerhard Hojan v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2015-09-03
- David James Martin v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2021-05-06
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
- Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-08· cited 331×
- Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-07-01· cited 322×
- Occhicone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-29· cited 321×
- Bertolotti v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-15· cited 198×
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-25· cited 172×
- Way v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-20· cited 143×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-04-28· cited 124×
- Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-12-09· cited 121×
- Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-03-07· cited 121×
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-05-11· cited 119×
- State v. ConeySupreme Court of Florida· 2003-03-06· cited 114×
- Duest v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-01-18· cited 103×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-02-13· cited 101×
- Kearse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-29· cited 93×
- Walls v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-02-09· cited 83×
- Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-04-05· cited 63×
- Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-05-28· cited 60×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.