Supreme Court· 1/29/1968
Smith v. Illinois
Citations
- 390 U.S. 129
- 88 S. Ct. 748
- 19 L. Ed. 2d 956
- 1968 U.S. LEXIS 3131
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the right of cross-examination is included in the right of an accused in a criminal case to confront the witnesses against him
- referring to denial of cross-examination as \constitutional error of the first magnitude\
- referring to denial of cross‐examination as “constitutional error of the first magnitude”
- defense counsel not allowed to ask witness for name and address even though witness admitted that the name he first gave was false
- questions tending to endanger personal safety of a witness go beyond proper bounds of cross-examination
- Sixth Amendment requires that name and address of principal prosecution witness be revealed so that defendant can conduct effective cross-examination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, White, Harlan, Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
563 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 2,202×
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 1,786×
- Gravel v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 778×
- People v. KlinerIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-12-03· cited 564×
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-01-24· cited 415×
- United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 1974-03-28· cited 355×
- State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court· 1984-11-26· cited 344×
- Timberlake v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-09-23· cited 307×
- United States v. VarelliSeventh Circuit· 1969-02-11· cited 268×
- United States v. Shukri BakerFifth Circuit· 2011-12-07· cited 263×
- People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-07-07· cited 263×
- Charles William Proffitt v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Offender RehabilitationEleventh Circuit· 1982-09-17· cited 259×
- United States v. Charles T. Bennett, Wilbert Haywood, Elmer Jessup, Henry Stanton and Farris ThomasSecond Circuit· 1969-02-26· cited 244×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1967-04-24· cited 1,521×
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 1,202×
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court· 1966-04-18· cited 1,130×
- Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court· 1947-06-09· cited 667×
- United States v. John Cardillo, Lawrence Harris, Ralph Kaminsky, John Knapp, Louis Margolis, and Louis PiselliSecond Circuit· 1963-04-24· cited 261×
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois· 1966-05-09· cited 5×
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois· 1966-03-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.