Michigan Supreme Court· 12/28/1984

People v. Smith

Citations

360 N.W.2d 841
420 Mich. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

opining that as used in the two constitutional provisions, “ ‘possessions’ and ‘effects’ are virtually identical in meaning” and therefore there exists no reason to treat those provisions differently
standing issue addressed when raised for the first time on appeal by the appellant and necessary to a proper determination of the case
electing to address the issue of standing first raised on appeal because resolution of the standing question was necessary to a proper determination of the case and because of the confusion concerning the proper state of the rule of law
electing to address the issue of standing first raised on appeal because resolution of the standing question was necessary to a proper determination of the case and because of the confusion concerning the proper state of the rule of law
adopting the Rakas \legitimate expectation of privacy\ test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Brickley, Boyle, Williams, Levin, Kavanagh, Cavanagh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.