Michigan Supreme Court· 8/22/1991

People v. Collins

Citations

475 N.W.2d 684
438 Mich. 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Caceres, supra, 440 U.S. 741, ‘‘made crystal clear’’ that fourth amendment to federal constitution does not require warrant to record telephone conver- sation with informant’s consent
decision did not involve an informant in the home, but it overruled a prior case that prohibited in-home surveillance by an informant
“[A]rt 1, § 11 is to be construed to provide the same protection as that secured by the Fourth Amendment, absent ‘compelling reason’ to impose a different interpretation.”
“[A]rt 1, § 11 is to be construed to provide the same protection as that secured by the Fourth Amendment, absent ‘compelling reason’ to impose a different interpretation.”
“ait 1, § 11 is to be construed to provide the same protection as that secured by the Fourth Amendment, absent ‘compelling reason’ to impose a different interpretation”
Supreme Court overruling a rule of law from a previous Supreme Court case and reversing the decision of the Court of Appeals that was before the Supreme Court for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brickley, Boyle, Riley, Griffin, Levin, Cavanagh, Mallett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.