People v. Gingrich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that there is no need to determine the reasonable expectation of privacy if the government physically intrudes on the defendant’s property or person, as the intrusion for purposes of gathering information constitutes a search by itself
• “can hardly be doubted” that personal laptop computer “storing personal information in the form of digital data must be considered defendant’s ‘effect’ under the Fourth Amendment,” and accessing its data to obtain information qualifies as “search”
• “[A] party may not expand the record on appeal[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).