Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/31/2007

State v. Davis

Citations

929 A.2d 278
283 Conn. 280
2007 Conn. LEXIS 303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting resem- blance between language of fourth amendment to United States constitution and that of article first, § 7, of Connecticut constitution
\a defendant may not invoke the fourth amendment to challenge the legality of a search unless he first can establish a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched\
\the [reasonable expectation of privacy] test offers no exact template that can be mechanically imposed upon a set of facts to determine whether ... standing is warranted\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
‘‘the [reasonable expectation of privacy] test offers no exact template that can be mechanically imposed upon a set of facts to determine whether . . . standing is warranted’’ (internal quota- tion marks omitted)
“[t]his court consistently has held that this language is not constitutionally defective”
We noted that, under article first, § 7, ‘‘this court has been willing to recognize a broader right to privacy under the state constitution. See, e.g., State v. Miller, [227 Conn. 363, 377, 630 A.2d 1315 (1993

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borden, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.