Colorado Court of Appeals· 4/3/2008

People v. Smith

Citations

183 P.3d 726
2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 548
2008 WL 879754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the court of appeals is bound by supreme court precedent
r ejecting defendant’s argument 10 that supreme court precedent was wrongly decided because we ar e bound by Colorado Supreme Court decisions
“The defendant must show a substantial nexus between the charge or conduct for which he or she is to be sentenced and the period of presentence confinement for which credit is sought.”
“The defendant must show a substantial nexus between the charge or conduct for which he or she is to be sentenced and the period of presentence confinement for which credit is sought.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothenberg, Bernard, Rovira

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Smith

3,280 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.