People v. Armendarez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining a passenger's standing to object to a search of his personal belongings found in the car and concluding that the passenger's belongings were subject to search pursuant to the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement
• examining a passenger's standing to object to a search of his personal belongings found in the car and concluding that the passenger's belongings were subject to search pursuant to the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement
• passenger who had no standing to challenge search of automobile did have standing to challenge search of his own personal effects in automobile
• “the simple asking of a defendant’s name is not interrogation or an investigative question requiring the issuance of Miranda warnings”
• a tip of an anonymous phone caller stating that he was witnessing a drug deal in a K mart parking lot helped to establish reasonable suspicion of criminality upon consideration of (1) the reliability of the informant, (2) the nature of the information given, and (3
• a tip of an anonymous phone caller stating that he was witnessing a drug deal in a K mart parking lot helped to establish reasonable suspicion of criminality upon consideration of (1) the reliability of the informant, (2) the nature of the information given, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).