Michigan Supreme Court· 7/28/2000

People v. Smith

Citations

615 N.W.2d 1
463 Mich. 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that \the influence of social and economic factors on juror participation does not demonstrate a systematic exclusion of African-Americans. The Sixth Amendment does not require [the government] to counteract these factors\
“[T]he influence of social and economic factors on juror partici pation does not demonstrate a systematic exclusion of [a distinctive group].”
“[T]he influence of social and economic factors on juror partidpation does not demonstrate a systematic exclusion of [a distinctive group].”
determination whether a systematic exclusion of a distinctive group has been shown depends, in part, on whether the representation of that group in the jury pool is “fair and reasonable”
“[N]o individual method should be used exclusive of the others.”
“[N]o individual method should be used exclusive of the others.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weaver, Taylor, Young, Markman, Corrigan, Kelly, Cavanagh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.