United States v. Darrell G. Hafen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendant’s knowledge of law is a factor weighing in favor of a valid waiver
• stating that comparative disparity is measured by calculating “the percentage difference between the proportion of blacks eligible to serve as jurors ... and the shortfall in black representation”
• stating that comparative disparity is measured by calculating \the percentage difference between the proportion of blacks eligible to serve as jurors . . . and the shortfall in black representation\
• calculating “the difference between the percentage of eligible blacks in the population [i.e., age eighteen or over] and the percentage of blacks on the master wheel”
• calculating “the difference between the percentage of eligible blacks in the population and the percentage of blacks on the master wheel”
• applying the absolute disparity test in the case before it, though acknowledging that the complete exclusion of a small distinctive group will result in only a small absolute disparity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).