People v. Eccles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the prosecution’s numerous visits and sustained contact with the missing witness’s mother and girlfriend and multiple visits to the witness’s known addresses constituted due diligence
• noting that, in accordance with MCR 7.210(A)(1), the “record” only consists of those items produced below, in the trial court
• applying rule to alleged Sixth Amendment fair cross section and Fourteenth Amendment Batson errors
• “The prosecutor explained that a son of that proposed juror had previously been prosecuted and convicted by his office.”
• “The prosecutor explained that a son of that proposed juror had previously been prosecuted and convicted by his office.”
• “The prosecutor explained that a son of that proposed juror had previously been prosecuted and convicted by his office.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).