Omotosho v. Giant Eagle, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying in part plaintiff’s motion to compel, where most of plaintiff’s claims were already decided, on the grounds that plaintiff was not entitled to “extremely costly, unproductive” discovery on irrelevant issues
• “The most important concept to glean from a close reading of the current discovery rules is that parties are to engage in discovery only as to matters relevant to or otherwise helpful to the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).