Skip to main content

People v. Taylor

Citations

  • 737 N.W.2d 790
  • 275 Mich. App. 177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the victim’s statements identifying his assailant as he was dying of his gunshot wounds were nontestimonial under Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36, 68; 124 S Ct 1354; 158 L Ed 2d 177 (2004) and were admissible pursuant to MRE 804(b)(2)
  • quotation marks 687 NW2d 342 (2004); People v Emerson (After Remand), 203 Mich App 345, 349; 512 NW2d 3 (1994). -3- omitted
  • “For the reasons stated by the Supreme Court of California, we hold that, under Crawford, dying declarations are admissible as an historic exception to the Confrontation Clause.”
  • “For the reasons stated by the Supreme Court of California, we hold that, under Crawford, dying declarations are admissible as an historic exception to the Confrontation Clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connell, Saad, Talbot

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.