Azariah Israel & Ronald Marquet Cheadle v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rule 24 (c) imposes no explicit ‘exhaustion of alternative remedies’ requirement, and we are satisfied that other circumstances can provide the necessary factual foundation for a finding that a juror is unable to carry out her oath.”
• “Nor can we agree on this record that there is a reasonable possibility that [the juror] was removed because she was a dissenting voice or because of her views on the evidence such that her removal violated appellant’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).