Skip to main content

People v. Sharp

Citations

  • 825 N.E.2d 706
  • 355 Ill. App. 3d 786
  • 292 Ill. Dec. 118
  • 2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where child victim “was present for cross-examination and answered defense counsel's questions, the confrontation clause places absolutely no constraints on the use of [her] prior statements”
  • when a witness “appears” for cross-examination by being present at cross-examination and answering counsel’s questions, the confrontation clause places no restraints on the use of the witness’ prior statements
  • Supreme Court in Crawford “neither overruled nor called into question” Fensterer or Owens
  • Supreme Court in Crawford “neither overruled nor called into question” Fensterer or Owens
  • discussing section 115 — 10 of the Code

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steigmann, Turner, Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.