Illinois Supreme Court· 3/22/1990

People v. Redd

Citations

553 N.E.2d 316
135 Ill. 2d 252
142 Ill. Dec. 802
1990 Ill. LEXIS 27

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

although trial court did not specifically articulate the Montgomery test, the record indicated that it understood and properly exercised its discretion under Montgomery
reversal is proper where prior inconsistent statements are admitted but the requirements of section 115—10.1 are not met
the “inconsistent” requirement under section 115-10.1 is met when a witness claims a memory loss at trial concerning a prior statement
reversal is proper where prior inconsistent statements are admitted but the requirements of section 115-10.1 are not met
\[a] reviewing court will not disturb a circuit court's ruling on a motion to quash arrest unless that finding is manifestly erroneous\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calvo, Miller, Sta, Mos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

135 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.