Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/5/2008

People v. Hampton

Citations

899 N.E.2d 532
387 Ill. App. 3d 206
326 Ill. Dec. 315
2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 1204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

witness was available for cross-examination despite testifying that he could not recall details about the crime when the prior statement was introduced into evidence
the reviewing court asks whether the State’s comments during closing argument engendered substantial prejudice against a defendant such that it is impossible to say whether a verdict of guilt resulted from them
witness available for cross-examination despite testimony that he could not recall anything about the crime other than that someone was shot and a red car was involved and he could not recall making any identifications or testifying at a co-defendant’s trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McBRIDE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.