Appellate Court of Illinois· 11/4/2005

People v. Reed

Citations

838 N.E.2d 328
361 Ill. App. 3d 995
297 Ill. Dec. 841
2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 1104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

affirming trial court decision to allow testimony from second victim from same incident
affirming trial court decision to allow testimony from second victim from same incident
affirming trial court decision to allow testimony from second victim from same incident
affirming trial court’s admission of other-crimes evidence after concluding that the evidence was admissible to show propensity under section 115 — 7.3 even though “[t]he trial court apparently did not rely on section 115 — 7.3” and “neither party cited that statute in the proceedings below”
“[w]e review the trial court’s judgment, not its rationale,” and “[w]e can affirm for any reason the record supports”
“[w]e review the trial court’s judgment, not its rationale,” and “[w]e can affirm for any reason the record supports”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Appleton, Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.