Skip to main content

People v. Warren

Citations

  • 671 N.E.2d 700
  • 173 Ill. 2d 348
  • 219 Ill. Dec. 533
  • 1996 Ill. LEXIS 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • test is whether legislature would have passed the valid portions of the statute absent the invalid portions
  • test is whether legislature would have passed the valid portions of the statute absent the invalid portions
  • a \defendant may not simply conjure up hypothetical situations in which the statutory standards might conceivably be unconstitutionally vague\
  • a “defendant may not simply conjure up hypothetical situations in which the statutory standards might conceivably be unconstitutionally vague”
  • \A court is vested with inherent power to enforce its orders and preserve its dignity by the use of contempt proceedings.\
  • “A court is vested with inherent power to enforce its orders and preserve its dignity by the use of contempt proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.