Appellate Court of Illinois· 4/29/2005

People v. Gilmore

Citations

828 N.E.2d 293
356 Ill. App. 3d 1023
293 Ill. Dec. 323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding “that the [United States Supreme] Court does not believe that admitting testimonial dying declarations violates the confrontation clause.”
noting that statements made to police are “testimonial”
trial court could consider untimely motion for new trial, filed while motion to reconsider sentence pending, because court had jurisdiction over case
“[T]he [Talach] court merely held that a trial court may consider an untimely posttrial motion so long as the court retains jurisdiction over the cause.”
trial court could consider untimely motion for new trial, filed while motion to reconsider sentence pending, because court had jurisdiction over case
trial court could consider untimely motion for new trial, filed while motion to reconsider sentence pending, because court had jurisdiction over case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.