Skip to main content

People v. Moore

Citations

  • 797 N.E.2d 631
  • 207 Ill. 2d 68
  • 278 Ill. Dec. 36
  • 2003 Ill. LEXIS 778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a trial court may base its evaluation of a pro se ineffective assistance claim on “the insufficiency of the defendant’s allegations on their face”
  • stating a harmless error analysis could be applied to a claim that the trial court did not follow Krankel procedures
  • explaining the failure to conduct a preliminary Krankel inquiry precludes appellate review of defendant’s claim
  • “reviewing court determines a legal question independently of the trial court’s judgment”
  • \reviewing court determines a legal question independently of the trial court's judgment\
  • rejecting the State’s argument that the defendant waived his argument that the court failed to conduct a proper inquiry into his ineffective-assistance claims because the defendant and his counsel “stood mutely and did nothing to request further inquiry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

174 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.