Appellate Court of Illinois· 8/16/2004
People v. Cummings
Citations
- 813 N.E.2d 1004
- 351 Ill. App. 3d 343
- 286 Ill. Dec. 311
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “At a minimum, the trial court must afford the defendant an opportunity to specify and support his complaints”
- trial court conducted adequate inquiry because it read defendant’s motion and gave defendant the opportunity to argue, explain, and support his allegations
- trial court conducted adequate inquiry because it read defendant’s motion and gave defendant the opportunity to argue, explain, and support his allegations
- trial court conducted adequate inquiry because it read defendant’s motion and gave defendant the opportunity to argue, explain, and support his allegations
- trial court conducted adequate inquiry because it read defendant’s motion and gave defendant the opportunity to argue, explain, and support his allegations
- defendant convicted of armed robbery who had prior convictions for murder and armed robbery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. HauschildIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-06-07· cited 135×
- People v. WardAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-02-02· cited 119×
- People v. GilmoreAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-04-29· cited 48×
- People v. BoboAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-08-24· cited 41×
- People v. FieldsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-11-18· cited 39×
- People v. FernandezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-09-26· cited 38×
- People v. DixonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-09-05· cited 36×
- People v. HamptonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-02-27· cited 27×
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-03-30· cited 26×
- People v. SchraderAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-12-08· cited 23×
- People v. HauschildAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-03-08· cited 18×
- People v. HarveyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-05-17· cited 15×
- People v. AndrewsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-03-24· cited 13×
- People v. CummingsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-08-06· cited 12×
- People v. SmallwoodAppellate Court of Illinois· 2024-09-24· cited 8×
- People v. LigonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-08-29· cited 5×
- Cummings v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 2005-05-23
- People v. Gilmore Modified on Denial of Rehearing - replaces original opinion filed 3/30/05Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-04-29
- People v. Schrader Modified on Denial of RehearingAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-12-08
- People v. DixonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-05-30
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ewing v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 1,555×
- People v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-05-22· cited 557×
- People v. BullIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-11-10· cited 417×
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-04-21· cited 151×
- People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-10-21· cited 141×
- People v. ChristyIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-21· cited 118×
- People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-12-19· cited 93×
- People v. JamisonIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-04-19· cited 75×
- People v. HartfieldAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-10-15· cited 48×
- People v. ProbstAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-11-21· cited 28×
- People v. VelleffAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-04-03· cited 25×
- People v. McNeilAppellate Court of Illinois· 1984-06-26· cited 23×
- People v. HudsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-10-24· cited 14×
- People v. LavoyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-16· cited 12×
- People v. GriffinAppellate Court of Illinois· 1983-08-16· cited 12×
- People v. SurlesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1984-07-20· cited 11×
- People v. O'MAHONEYAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-05-05· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.