Skip to main content

People v. Cummings

Citations

  • 813 N.E.2d 1004
  • 351 Ill. App. 3d 343
  • 286 Ill. Dec. 311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “At a minimum, the trial court must afford the defendant an opportunity to specify and support his complaints”
  • trial court conducted adequate inquiry because it read defendant’s motion and gave defendant the opportunity to argue, explain, and support his allegations
  • trial court conducted adequate inquiry because it read defendant’s motion and gave defendant the opportunity to argue, explain, and support his allegations
  • trial court conducted adequate inquiry because it read defendant’s motion and gave defendant the opportunity to argue, explain, and support his allegations
  • trial court conducted adequate inquiry because it read defendant’s motion and gave defendant the opportunity to argue, explain, and support his allegations
  • defendant convicted of armed robbery who had prior convictions for murder and armed robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.