People v. Cabrales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court erred by proceeding to full hearing on the merits of the defendant’s pro se claims instead of conducting a fact-gathering investigation
• trial court erred by proceeding to full hearing on the merits of the defendant's pro se claims instead of conducting a fact-gathering investigation
• \We must conclude there was no preliminary investigation because the court proceeded to a full hearing on the merits of defendant's pro se motion without any discussion or resolution of the need for a preliminary investigation for appointment of conflict counsel.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).