· 12/13/2004
People v. Monterroso
Citations
- 101 P.3d 956
- 22 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1
- 34 Cal. 4th 743
- 2004 Daily Journal DAR 14707
- 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10899
- 2004 Cal. LEXIS 11763
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “the common law pedigree of the exception for dying declarations poses no conflict with the Sixth Amendment.”
- concluding that \the common law pedigree of the exception for dying declarations poses no conflict with the Sixth Amendment.\
- noting that evidence sought to be presented was indisputably available during trial, and party offered no excuse for not asking for a ruling on its admission prior to the close of evidence
- discussing the admission of a testimonial dying declaration after Crawford in light of that state’s common law
- noting that evidence sought to be presented was indisputably available during trial, and party offered no excuse for not asking for a ruling on its admission prior to the close of evidence
- “if, as Crawford teaches, the confrontation clause ‘is most Gardner Page 14 sense impression. Under Rule 804(b)(2
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baxter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.