California Supreme Court· 12/13/2004

People v. Monterroso

Citations

101 P.3d 956
22 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1
34 Cal. 4th 743
2004 Daily Journal DAR 14707
2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10899
2004 Cal. LEXIS 11763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “the common law pedigree of the exception for dying declarations poses no conflict with the Sixth Amendment.”
concluding that \the common law pedigree of the exception for dying declarations poses no conflict with the Sixth Amendment.\
noting that evidence sought to be presented was indisputably available during trial, and party offered no excuse for not asking for a ruling on its admission prior to the close of evidence
discussing the admission of a testimonial dying declaration after Crawford in light of that state’s common law
noting that evidence sought to be presented was indisputably available during trial, and party offered no excuse for not asking for a ruling on its admission prior to the close of evidence
“if, as Crawford teaches, the confrontation clause ‘is most Gardner Page 14 sense impression. Under Rule 804(b)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baxter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

98 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

115 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.