Illinois Supreme Court· 12/5/2002
People v. Cox
Citations
- 782 N.E.2d 275
- 202 Ill. 2d 462
- 270 Ill. Dec. 81
- 2002 Ill. LEXIS 961
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a police officer's actions during a traffic stop must be reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the stop in the first place
- reaffirming lockstep principle with respect to the search and seizure provision of the state constitution and the fourth amendment
- reaffirming lockstep principle with respect to the search and seizure provision of the state constitution and the fourth amendment
- reaffirming lockstep principle with respect to the search and seizure provision of the state constitution and the fourth amendment
- discussing the application of the exclusionary rule in the context of a traffic stop
- discussing the application of the exclusionary rule in the context of a traffic stop
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fitzgerald, Freeman, Garman, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- People v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court· 2013-06-28· cited 330×
- United States v. BranchFourth Circuit· 2008-08-20· cited 319×
- People v. CaballesIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-05-18· cited 270×
- People v. BewIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-03-20· cited 226×
- People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-03-20· cited 145×
- O'BOYLE v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2005-07-28· cited 94×
- Badelle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-08-06· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. FeyenordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-09-02· cited 65×
- People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-11-20· cited 59×
- Ross v. Mauro ChevroletAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-12-28· cited 57×
- St. George v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-05-25· cited 52×
- People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-05-17· cited 52×
- People v. GilmoreAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-04-29· cited 48×
- State v. VerlingNebraska Supreme Court· 2005-04-01· cited 46×
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-07-15· cited 44×
- People v. CaballesIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-11-20· cited 42×
- People v. DriggersIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-07-05· cited 27×
- People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-10-20· cited 24×
- People v. ReedyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-10-16· cited 23×
Cites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2001-06-11· cited 1,834×
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,525×
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
- Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court· 2001-04-24· cited 1,388×
- Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-03-06· cited 1,325×
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court· 2000-11-28· cited 1,205×
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 1,170×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.