People v. Nestrock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Act applies to all conversations, regardless of whether they were intended to be private
• holding that the Act applies to all conversations, regardless of whether they were intended to be private
• stating that the clause does “not alter the fundamental principles on which our legal system is based”
• holding that a statement that the defendant made at least fifteen minutes after the event in question was not an excited utterance when the defendant could not show that she did not have an opportunity to reflect
• finding that a recording made for the purpose of assisting with investigating a crime, but where there was no threat of harm to the parties who made the recording, did not come within the exemption
• finding that a recording made for the purpose of assisting with investigating a crime, but where there was no threat of harm to the parties who made the recording, did not come within the exemption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).