Skip to main content
· 10/12/2006

Harkins v. State

Citations

  • 143 P.3d 706
  • 122 Nev. 974
  • 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 84
  • 2006 Nev. LEXIS 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that this court reviews a district court's decision to admit or exclude evidence under a hearsay exception for abuse of discretion
  • noting that when determining whether a statement is testimonial, it is necessary to look at the totality of the circumstances surrounding the statement
  • holding totality of the circumstances includes who is talking and why the parties are having the conversation
  • discussing the SUPREME COuRT OF NEVADA 5 En. (0) 1947A ADD declarant's injuries and other surrounding circumstances as relevant when assessing the declarant's belief of imminent death
  • identifying relevant factors used in determining whether hearsay statement is testimonial
  • \self- defense is not available to an original aggressor\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Becker, Parraguirre

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.