· 10/12/2006
Harkins v. State
Citations
- 143 P.3d 706
- 122 Nev. 974
- 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 84
- 2006 Nev. LEXIS 113
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that this court reviews a district court's decision to admit or exclude evidence under a hearsay exception for abuse of discretion
- noting that when determining whether a statement is testimonial, it is necessary to look at the totality of the circumstances surrounding the statement
- holding totality of the circumstances includes who is talking and why the parties are having the conversation
- discussing the SUPREME COuRT OF NEVADA 5 En. (0) 1947A ADD declarant's injuries and other surrounding circumstances as relevant when assessing the declarant's belief of imminent death
- identifying relevant factors used in determining whether hearsay statement is testimonial
- \self- defense is not available to an original aggressor\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas, Becker, Parraguirre
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.