Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 1/14/2009

Paz v. Brush Engineered Materials, Inc.

Citations

  • 555 F.3d 383
  • 2009 WL 73874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding expert’s opinion based on insufficient information
  • affirming exclusion of expert report based on erroneous information, i.e., slides that did not exist.
  • affirming exclusion of expert report based on erroneous information, i.e., slides that did not exist.
  • “Where the expert’s opinion is based on insufficient information, the analysis is unreliable.”
  • “Where an expert’s opinion is based on insufficient information, the analysis is unreliable.”
  • affirming exclusion of expert opinion that relied on erroneous information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Chief Judge, Jolly, Circuit Judge, and Montalvo, District Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Paz v. Brush Engineered Materials, Inc.

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.