Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Eland Energy Inc., e

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “in seventeen years since [Stoker ] appeared, no Texas court has yet held that recovery is available for an insurer’s extreme act ....”
• noting that “in seventeen years since [Stoker] appeared, no Texas court has yet held that 15 recovery is available for an insurer’s extreme act . . . .”
• noting that “no Texas court has yet held that recovery is available for an insurer’s extreme act, causing injury independent of the policy claim, in the first-party claim context”
• “[N]o Texas court has yet held that recovery is available for an insurer’s extreme act, causing injury independent of the policy claim.”
• “[N]o Texas court has yet held that recovery is available for an insurer’s extreme act, causing injury independent of the policy claim, in the first- party context, let alone in the third-party claim context.”
• “[T]o establish a violation of § 541.060(a)(3), a plaintiff must prove that the insurer’s explanation of the factual and/or legal basis in the policy for an offer of compromise settlement was not provided promptly or was not reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).