Fifth Circuit· 2/19/2003
Bocanegra v. Vicmar Services, Inc.
Citations
- 320 F.3d 581
- 60 Fed. R. Serv. 804
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2960
- 2003 WL 244886
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding district court erred in finding expert’s testimony unhelpful regarding effect of marijuana on cognitive functions because it would have aided jury despite lack of testimony concerning its impact upon defendant
- stating that evidentiary rulings are reviewed under the harmless error standard
- allowing an expert to opine on general principles regarding effects of marijuana on the ability to operate a motor vehicle
- allowing expert testimony based on an accepted scientific study in the field that, when viewed in conjunction with the expert’s personal training and experience on the subject, formed a reliable opinion
- “A trial court abuses its discretion when its ruling is based on an erroneous view of the law . . . .”
- “[E]xpert testimony must be relevant . . . in the sense that the expert’s proposed opinion would assist the trier of fact to understand or determine a fact in issue.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garza, Clement, Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2007-04-05· cited 625×
- Triple Tee Golf, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2007-04-17· cited 407×
- Burleson v. Texas Department of Criminal JusticeFifth Circuit· 2004-12-09· cited 314×
- Paz v. Brush Engineered Materials, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2009-01-14· cited 195×
- Gregory Johnson v. Arkema, IncorporatedFifth Circuit· 2012-06-20· cited 176×
- Michael Baisden v. I'm Ready Productions, Inc., etFifth Circuit· 2012-08-31· cited 151×
- United States v. Yanez SosaFifth Circuit· 2008-01-04· cited 142×
- Elzie Ball v. James LeBlancFifth Circuit· 2015-07-08· cited 138×
- N. Cypress Med. Ctr. Operating Co. v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Fifth Circuit· 2018-07-31· cited 137×
- United States v. RagsdaleFifth Circuit· 2005-09-27· cited 119×
- Franklin v. BlackmoreFifth Circuit· 2003-12-22· cited 116×
- John Brown v. Natl Railroad Passenger Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2013-01-28· cited 115×
- Carlson v. Bioremedi Therapeutic Systems, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2016-05-16· cited 98×
- Henry Sims, Jr. v. Kia Motors of America, IFifth Circuit· 2016-10-05· cited 75×
- M. D. Ex Rel. Stukenberg v. AbbottFifth Circuit· 2018-10-18· cited 73×
- United States v. HarmsFifth Circuit· 2006-03-06· cited 72×
- United States v. MacEo Simmons, Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 2006-11-21· cited 70×
- Weiser-Brown Operating Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceFifth Circuit· 2015-09-16· cited 67×
- David Bailey v. Bryan CollierFifth Circuit· 2017-08-18· cited 61×
- G.H. Leidenheimer Baking Co. v. SharpFifth Circuit· 2006-02-08· cited 40×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court· 1999-03-23· cited 8,651×
- Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1998-09-16· cited 919×
- Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Bottling Co.First Circuit· 1998-12-01· cited 366×
- Yolanda and Terrence Ballou, Etc., Lula Mae Leblanc, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Henri Studios, Inc., Cross-AppelleesFifth Circuit· 1981-09-25· cited 94×
- Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. H.R. \Bum\ Bright, Hopkins & Sutter, Peter F. Lovato III and Thomas D. GraberFifth Circuit· 1993-12-07· cited 53×
- Gustavson v. GaynorNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-12-16· cited 26×
- State v. RitchieSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1991-12-12· cited 22×
- Great Plains Equipment, Inc. v. Koch Gathering Systems, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1995-02-24· cited 16×
- Fowler v. New York City Department of SanitationS.D. New York· 1989-01-30· cited 13×
- Donald v. Triple S Well Service, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1998-03-12· cited 11×
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 1279 v. Cambria County Transit AuthorityW.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-07-22· cited 8×
- State v. RitchieLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1990-01-24· cited 5×
- Holloman v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityN.D. Ohio· 1990-04-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.