Skip to main content
· 2/11/2014

Carl E. Woodward, L.L.C. v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance

Citations

  • 743 F.3d 91
  • 2014 WL 902575

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that insured was not entitled to damages, attorneys’ fees and costs where insurer had no duty to defend
  • \We now compare the complaint and the policy in order to analyze whether a duty to defend arose.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Southwick, Haynes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.