Railroad Management Co. v. CFS Louisiana Midstream Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exclusion of an exhibit was not an abuse of discretion absent indicia of authenticity within the exhibit itself or other evidence on the record tending to authenticate the exhibit
• clarifying that an inference of authenticity does not apply when the proponent of the evidence is the producing party
• noting that where appellant challenges only one alternate holding, argument that other holding was in error is waived
• noting that where appellant challenges only one alternate holding, argument that other holding was in error is waived
• noting that where appellant challenges only one alternate holding, argument that other holding was in error is waived
• noting that where appellant challenges only one alternate holding, argument that other holding was in error is waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).