Wagoner v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is true that in Joiner, the Supreme Court indicated that an expert opinion on general causation 54 R. Doc. 44-7 (Cook Deposition 63:17-22, 104:21-105:1
• “It is true 49 R. Doc. 43-4 at 87 (Cook Report). 50 R. Doc. 51 at 3. 51 R. Doc. 43-4 at 57 (Cook Report
• “Whether epidemiological studies support an expert’s opinion on the question of general causation in a toxic tort case is critical to determining the reliability of the opinion.”
• “Whether epidemiological studies support an expert’s opinion on the question of general causation in a toxic tort case is critical to determining the reliability of the opinion.”
• “Whether epidemiological studies support an expert’s opinion on the question of general causation in a toxic tort case is critical to determining the reliability of the opinion.”
• “Whether epidemiological studies support an expert’s opinion on the question of general causation in a toxic tort case is critical to determining the reliability of the opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).