Fifth Circuit· 10/5/2004

Compaq Computer Corp. v. Ergonome Inc.

Citations

387 F.3d 403
59 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 944
72 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1705
65 Fed. R. Serv. 582
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20765
2004 WL 2222385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the second factor favored fair use because the work in question was factual despite the district court’s finding “at summary judgment that portions of [the work] were sufficiently original to warrant a copyrightability finding”
affirming in part district court's finding of alter ego as a discovery sanction under Rule 37(b)(2)(A)(i)
affirming in part district court’s finding of alter ego as a discovery sanction under Rule 37(b)(2)(A)(i)
affirming a $2,765,026.90 fee award to the prevailing defendant after a seven-day trial
the district court’s finding of alter ego as a Rule 37(b)(2)(A) discovery sanction reviewed for abuse of discretion
affirming award of attorneys’ fees against party for discovery abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Dennis, Pickering

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Compaq Computer Corp. v. Ergonome Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.