Supreme Court· 4/27/2005

Pace v. DiGuglielmo

Citations

544 U.S. 408
125 S. Ct. 1807
161 L. Ed. 2d 669
2005 U.S. LEXIS 3705
5 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3526
73 U.S.L.W. 4304
18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that untimely state postconviction motions are not considered \properly filed\ for purposes of AEDPA
holding that untimely state postconviction motions are not considered “properly filed” for purposes of AEDPA
holding that a PCRA petition found to be not timely was not “properly filed” so as to trigger AEDPA’s statutory toll
recognizing that, 26 if a PCR petition is untimely under state law, the federal limitations period would not be 27 tolled
holding that an untimely filed Pennsylvania PCRA petition was not a “properly filed application” under AEDPA
holding that the burden is on the petitioner to demonstrate a basis for equitable tolling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rehnquist, O'Con-Nor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

738 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.