· 3/28/2001
Fortunado L. Dictado,petitioner-Appellant v. Kenneth Ducharme,respondent-Appellee
Citations
- 244 F.3d 724
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 3089
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2468
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 4935
- 2001 WL 293252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the untimely petition in that case tolled the AEDPA statute of limitations
- personal restraint petitions dismissed in state court as \repetitive and untimely\ were still \properly filed applications\ within the meaning of S 2244(d)(2)
- petition dismissed under state statute barring successive petitions unless \good cause\ is shown for not raising claims earlier may be properly filed
- bar to successive state 15 personal restraint petitions was a “condition to obtaining relief” and not a “condition to 16 filing”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning, Beezer, Kleinfeld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.