Skip to main content
· 3/28/2001

Fortunado L. Dictado,petitioner-Appellant v. Kenneth Ducharme,respondent-Appellee

Citations

  • 244 F.3d 724
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 3089
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2468
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 4935
  • 2001 WL 293252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the untimely petition in that case tolled the AEDPA statute of limitations
  • personal restraint petitions dismissed in state court as \repetitive and untimely\ were still \properly filed applications\ within the meaning of S 2244(d)(2)
  • petition dismissed under state statute barring successive petitions unless \good cause\ is shown for not raising claims earlier may be properly filed
  • bar to successive state 15 personal restraint petitions was a “condition to obtaining relief” and not a “condition to 16 filing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Beezer, Kleinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.