Supreme Court· 6/14/2010

Holland v. Florida

Citations

177 L. Ed. 2d 130
2010 U.S. LEXIS 4946
130 S. Ct. 2549
560 U.S. 631
22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 437
78 U.S.L.W. 4555

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that §2254(i) does not preclude equitable tolling of a statute of limitations based on attorney misconduct in habeas proceedings
holding that a petitioner must prove that he used “reasonable diligence” in pursuing his claims (internal quotation marks omitted)
holding that 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) “does not set forth an inflexible rule requiring dismissal whenever its clock has run” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
holding that 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) “does not set forth an inflexible rule requiring dismissal whenever its clock has run” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
holding that § 2244(d) is subject to equitable tolling if Ae petitioner demonstrates “ '(1) that he has been pursuing his rights diligently, and (2
holding that unprofessional attorney conduct, if sufficiently egregious, may constitute an extraordinary circumstance justifying equitable tolling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alito, Breyer, Ginsburg, Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia, Stevens, Thomas, Tomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

700 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Holland v. Florida

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.