Supreme Court· 6/18/2001

Duncan v. Walker

Citations

533 U.S. 167
121 S. Ct. 2120
150 L. Ed. 2d 251
2001 U.S. LEXIS 4493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the statute of limitations is not tolled during the pendancy of a federal petition
holding that the statute of limitations is not tolled during the pendancy of a federal petition
holding that “effect [must be given], if possible, to every clause and word of a statute”
recognizing that “the 1 year limitation period of § 2244(d)(1) quite plainly serves the well-recognized interest in the finality of state court judgments”
recognizing that \the 1 year limitation period of § 2244(d)(1) quite plainly serves the well-recognized interest in the finality of state court judgments\
holding that the pendency of a federal habeas petition does not toll the statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor, Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Stevens, Sou-Ter, Breyer, Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,134 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Duncan v. Walker

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.